Legal Opinion

Kansas Flour Mills Co. v. Moll

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1920No. 22,678PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Johnson district court; Jabez 0. Rankin, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action by the Kansas Flour Mills Company to recover from R. W; Moll $270 as damages resulting from the alleged violation of a contract for the sale of flour. The defendant prevailed, and plaintiff appeals.

The contract was for the sale of three shipments of a brand designated as “Fanehon flour,” which is a high-patent hard-wheat flour. The first shipment was made to defendant at Olathe, and was accepted and found to be of the kind and quality of flour sold. The second shipment was accepted and paid for, but defendant found…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carleton v. . Lombard, Ayres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Morse v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891
  3. Flint v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Springfield Shingle Co. v. Edgecomb Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Whitaker v. McCormickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Tank Co. v. Revert Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Garden v. HainesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Kardis v. BarrereLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Burgner-Bowman Lumber Co. v. McCord-Kistler Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API