Legal Opinion

Morris v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1989No. 86-SC-84-MRPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANT, Justice.

On the evening of October 18, 1984, appellant Joseph Edward Morris, Tony Mallory and Jackie Gilbert formulated a plan to burglarize the home of Mr. and Mrs. George Pope in Harlan County, the Popes being 102 and 95 years of age. At the Pope home, on this occasion, in addition to the mother and father, were the three sons of the Popes — Howard Pope, who had gone upstairs to retire for the night; and John and George, Jr., who were in the living room watching television. Appellant Morris and Mallory were armed, and Gilbert carried with him a roll of duct tape to be utilized to bind…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  4. Don C. Silverthorne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. McQueen v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Sanders v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hodge v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Caudill v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Mabe v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API