Brolaski v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California; Maurice T. Dooling, Judge. Harry Brolaski and another were convicted of conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act, and thev bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
GIEBERT, Circuit Judge.
Under an indictment which charged them with conspiracy to violate title II of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305) and Regulation 60, promulgated by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the plaintiffs in error were convicted. The indictment set forth the means whereby the object of the conspiracy was to be effected, and certain overt acts were alleged to have been committed in pursuance thereof.
[1-4] Error is assigned to the denial of the motion of plaintiffs in error in arrest of judgment, and their motion for a new trial. While rulings on neither of these…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Peterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bank of Italy v. F. Romeo & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Brasfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- United States v. CampanaroDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1943
- ARMANDO NATERAUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.