Legal Opinion

ARMANDO NATERA

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California

Decided November 16, 2022No. 17-14112Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 FRESNO DIVISION 3 4 In re ) Case No. 17-14112-B-13 ) 5 ARMANDO NATERA, ) DCN: TAT-2 ) 6 ) Debtor. ) 7 ) 8 MEMORANDUM RULING ON ROGER AND SANDRA WARD’S MOTION TO RETROACTIVELY ANNUL THE AUTOMATIC STAY 9 ————————————————————————————— 10 Thomas A. Trapani, FIDELITY NATIONAL LAW GROUP, THE LAW DIVISION 11 OF FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC., Walnut Creek, CA, for Roger Ward and Sandra Ward, Movants. 12 Peter A. Sauer, FEAR WADDELL, P.C., Fresno, CA, for Armando 13 Natera, Debtor. 14 ————————————————————————————— 15 RENÉ LASTRETO…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Fjeldsted v. Lien (In Re Fjeldsted)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. TicchiarelliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Plyam v. Precision Development, LLC (In Re Plyam)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Oakdale Village Group v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API