State v. Freeman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Chief Justice.
In appellant’s brief counsel has grouped seventy-four assignments of error within the framework of eight questions. Of these questions we will consider only three. The other five encompass assignments which are either patently without merit or challenge miniscule errors which are harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Any discussion of these questions would necessarily be (1) a mere repetition of the well-established rules regarding the sound discretion of the trial judge as to the allowance of leading questions and the scope of cross-examination, and (2) a wordy…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. McZornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.