Legal Opinion
Marsh v. Degeler
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1891No. 300PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from, Superior Cou/rt, Lewis County. Action by R R Marsh against F. A. Degeler and others for damages for forcible entry and detainer. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J.
The verdict of the jury in this case was rendered March 23,1891. On the 26th of March a motion for a new trial was submitted and denied. In connection with the journal entry of the order denying the motion for a new trial, there occurs the following:
“To which order of the court in overruling of the defendants’ motion for a new trial the defendants by their *72attorneys then and there excepted, and pray an appeal to the supreme court, which is allowed.”
Judgment was subsequently entered upon the verdict. The motion to dismiss the appeal for want…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tripp v. MagnusWashington Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- Strickland v. Rainier Golf & Country ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Paich v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Strickland v. Rainier Golf & Country ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Pelly v. BehnemanWashington Supreme Court · 1932