Central Gas Co. v. Hope Oil Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
There are two questions presented by this record. The first arises upon the motion of the Hope Oil Company, defendant in error, to dismiss this proceeding for the reason that no exception was taken to the finding of the Court of Appeals in affirming the judgment of the court of common pleas.
While it is claimed that a supplemental journal entry was prepared by the Court of Appeals preserving such exception, we do not feel that the same was necessary, for the reason that, in so far as the rights of the Central Gas Company, plaintiff in error, to its judgment on the special findings of fact, are…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Kohlmayer v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Co. v. O'DayOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. WassmanOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- McClanahan v. Woodward Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1957
- Ohio Fuel Gas Co. v. RinglerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.