Brumwell & Co. v. Stebbins Bros.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District' Court. — Hon. G-eo. W. Wakefield, Judge. The plaintiffs claim a right to certain money in-the hands of a garnishee paramount to that of certain interveners and others. On the final hearing a decree was rendered in favor of the interveners. The plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
At some time prior to the tenth-day of September, 1888, James Stebbins, R. H. Stebbins, Sam Stebbins and George Freeland were engaged in business as copartners under the firm-name-of Stebbins Bros. On the date named the plaintiffs commenced this action against Stebbins Bros, as a firm, the members not being named, and as grounds for attachment stated “that defendants [Stebbins Bros.] are about to remove their property out of the state without leaving sufficient for the payment of their debts; that defendants [Stebbins Bros.] are about to remove permanently out of the county, and have property…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mason v. RiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Richard v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
3Cited by14 opinions
- McLaughlin Brothers v. HallowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- John Bollman Co. v. S. Bachman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Hanson v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
- Ballester v. Descartes, Treasurer of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
- State v. ChildersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.