Legal Opinion

Wentworth v. Mann

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 9, 1913No. Gen. No. 17,278PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William H. Hinebaugu, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Graves

Defendant in error began suit in the Municipal Court to recover commissions claimed to have been earned by him under the following contract, viz.:

“March 9th, 1910.
"Whiteside & Wentworth,

140 Dearborn street,

Chicago.

GENTLEMEN:

Ton are hereby authorized to sell my property, described as 4445 Evanston Ave. at the price of twelve thousand dollars, upon the following terms:

Cash Five Thousand Five Hundred, Balance as per mortgage. Subject pro-rata to taxes and assessments levied subsequent to the year 1909, also special assessments for and to an encumbrance of $6,500 due May, 1910.

When you sell the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Henry v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Bunn v. KeachIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Gilbert v. CoonsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  4. Smith v. KeelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Swigart v. HawleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Camp v. HollisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  2. Schwartz v. AkerlundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  3. Whyte v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API