Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Employee's Retirement System of Alabama

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 29, 1994No. 1921416PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted this petition for the writ of certiorari to allow the Court to address the question whether § 36-27-16(e)(1), Ala. Code 1975, requires suspension of retirement benefits upon a State retiree's reemployment with the State or with a county, city, or other governmental unit participating in the Employees' Retirement System ("ERS"); or whether suspension of retirement benefits is required only upon such reemployment when additional retirement credit is accrued.

Johnny B. Nesmith, a retired state trooper, sought to contract with the City of Cullman to work for one year as an investigator…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Tuscaloosa County Com'n v. Deputy SheriffsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. v. City of HartselleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Black Belt Wood Co., Inc. v. SessionsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Tatum v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Governor Siegelman v. Alabama Assn., S. Bds.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Ex Parte GaunttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Daniel G. Hamm v. Tomeka Scott JamesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Boutwell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API