Legal Opinion
Daniel G. Hamm v. Tomeka Scott James
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 21, 2005No. 04-10511, 04-10512 and 04-10526PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Daniel G. Hamm (the “Trustee”), the Trustee in the Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases of Debtors-Appellees Tomeka Scott James, Linda Sankey, and Hope Ho-neycutt (collectively, the “Debtors”), objected to the Debtors’ claims for federal earned income tax credit (“EITC”) exemptions in their individual bankruptcy cases. The bankruptcy court overruled the Trustee’s objections, and the district court affirmed the bankruptcy court’s rulings. The Trustee now appeals the district court’s order. After review and oral argument, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In this consolidated appeal,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sorenson v. Secretary of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. McNabCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- In Re BrockhouseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1998
- In Re LongstreetUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Torrens v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Williamson v. Westby (In re Westby)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- In re GentryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- Medical Transp. Mgmt. Corp. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
- Williamson v. Murray (In re Murray)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.