Legal Opinion
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Gee Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 20, 2001No. 98C1619PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PALLMEYER, District Judge.
On March 18, 1998, Norfolk Southern Railway Company (“Norfolk Southern”) filed a ten-count complaint against Defendants Gee Company, James Gee. Sr., Chicago Flameproof and Wood Specialties Corp. (“CFW Specialties”), John Janssen, Vincent Mancini and Maywood Industries, Inc. The complaint asserted, inter alia, claims under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, and the Illinois Environmental Protection Act, 415 ILCS 5/22.2, and sought recovery for environmental damage…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- James R. Ahrenholz, Plaintiff-Appellee/respondent v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Defendant-Appellant/petitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Pmc, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Nutrasweet Company, and Monsanto Company v. X-L Engineering Company, and Paul T. Prikos, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- County Line Investment Company And, Wagco Land Development, Inc. v. Calvin L. TinneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Bedford Affiliates v. SillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- CITY OF GARY, INDIANA v. ShaferDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
- Carson Harbor Village v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Rolan v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019