Application of Hans Christian Andersen
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of the sole remaining claim of appellant’s application entitled “Treatment of Textile Goods Made From Synthetic Yam Material, 1 as unpatentable over the prior art under 35. U.S.C. § 103. All other claims were either canceled or withdrawn under Rule 142(b).
As disclosed in the specification, the claimed invention relates to a process of treating textile articles such as nylon stockings to improve their heat insulating and moisture absorbing qualities and to reduce their hard touch and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of Leslie E. SoderquistCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Leo v. BentCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- In re HarzaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Berwyn E. EtterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Orthopedic Equipment Company, Inc., and Marriott Corporation, and Cross-Appellees v. The United States, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- In Re Robert C. Sneed and Joseph C. Young, and E-Z Lay Pipe Corp. And Stream Line, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- In Re Berwyn E. EtterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Orthopedic Equipment Company, Inc., and Marriott Corporation, and Cross-Appellees v. The United States, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983