Legal Opinion

Jeffrey Forbes and Kimberly Michaud, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Macy’s, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 13, 2026No. 1:25-cv-11009Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 25-11009-GAO JEFFREY FORBES and KIMBERLY MICHAUD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MACY’S, INC., Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER March 13, 2026 O’TOOLE, D.J. Jeffrey Forbes and Kimberly Michaud, the named plaintiffs in this putative class action, allege that when they applied for a “Massachusetts-based job” with the defendant, Macy’s, Inc., (First Am. Class Action Compl. (“Am. Compl.”) ¶ 6 (dkt. no. 22)), the application materials they “filled out,” (id. ¶ 36), did not contain a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API