Worthington v. Cary
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 21 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM Bl’LEAN CIRCUIT COURT. The facts appear in the opinion of the court. The land was subject to the attachment against Eli Riley, and ought to have been sold under it.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE DUVALL
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal from a final order of the court below, discharging an attachment which had been levied on one hundred and sixty acres of land, the legal title to which was in Eli Riley, but which was claimed by Lewis Riley. The circuit judge seems to have decided that Eli Riley held the legal title to the land for the use and benefit of the claimant, Lewis Riley; that the land was, therefore, not subject to the debts of the former, and, upon that ground, discharged the attachment.
This conclusion is not sustained by the record. It is obvious,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Clolinger v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Buckley v. WakefieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875