Buckley v. Wakefield

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

Appellees, in their petition, alleged that Mike Buckley has no property subject to execution, and their said debt of $174.05 will be endangered by delay of judgment and return of no property. AVherefore, they pray an attachment against the defendant, Mike Buckley; and they further state that they verily believe that James Fitzpatrick is indebted to the defendant, Mike Buckley, in a sum sufficient to fully pay their said debt. AVherefore these plaintiffs pray that said James Fitzpatrick be made a party to the proceedings, and that summons as garnishee be issued against…