Legal Opinion
Rochester Telephone Corp. v. Public Service Commission
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 30, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Casey, J.
Concerned about the need for an adjustment to a utility’s rates to reflect the uncompensated use of certain intangible utility assets by the utility’s unregulated affiliates and to offset certain costs imposed on the utility by its affiliates that could not be readily or directly quantified, respondent Public Service Commission (hereinafter the PSC) ordered a separate proceeding to consider the propriety and need for such an adjustment. Although the issues originally arose in the context of a proceeding involving petitioner Rochester Telephone Corporation…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Abrams v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. v. PubLic Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Rochester Gas & Elec. Corp. v. PUB. SERV. COMM'N OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Syquia v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- City of New York v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Minnegasco v. MN PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'NCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Southern Union Co. v. Missouri Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2001
- Matter of Emerald Green Lake Louise Marie Water Co., Inc. v. Public Serv. Commn. of the State of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022