Legal Opinion

Clinton, Katherine

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 2011No. PD-0119-11Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0119-11 KATHERINE CLINTON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S AND APPELLANT’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS UPSHUR COUNTY P RICE, J., filed a concurring opinion. CONCURRING OPINION I agree with the Court’s conclusion that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant “used” the debit card in this case.1 I agree that Section 32.31 of the Penal Code should not be construed in such a way as to require the State to prove that the 1 Majority opinion, at 12. Clinton — 2 perpetrator…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Shipp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. State v. RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. Clinton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API