Legal Opinion
Baker v. American Juice, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided July 6, 1994No. 2:93cv262 JMPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY, District Judge.
This is a lawsuit that, from the record before the court, should never have been brought. Jerry Baker’s lawyer should have known better. Perhaps he did. At any rate, on April 8, 1994, American Juice, Inc. moved for summary judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. To this date, Baker has not responded to that motion. American Juice’s motion is . hereby GRANTED. American Juice’s mo tion for attorneys’ fees is also GRANTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1927.
I
“[S]ummary judgment is appropriate — in fact, is mandated' — where there are no disputed issues of material fact and the movant must…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Spriggs v. Diamond Auto GlassCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Lamarilyn Fadeyi v. Planned Parenthood Association of Lubbock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Derrick Dorrell Turner v. Arkansas Insurance Department, Mike PickensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Curtis v. DiMaioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Mass v. McClenahanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.