People v. Turmon
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentMackenzie, J.
While I agree with the majority that defendant’s guilty plea did not waive his due process claim, I find that the record on appeal does not support the majority’s conclusion that defendant was a victim of judge shopping by the prosecutor. The majority relies on People v George, 114 Mich App 204; 318 NW2d 666 (1982), Iv den 414 Mich 931 (1982), and People v Walls, 117 Mich App 691; 324 NW2d 136 (1982), where this Court found subsequent prosecutions violative of the defendants’ right to due process since at those subsequent preliminary examinations the prosecutor introduced no new additional…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. Roderick JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. LasloMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. GeorgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. WallsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Gaffney v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.