Legal Opinion
Somers Co. v. Pix
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 4, 1913No. 11146PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered October 24, 1912, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract, after a trial to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
Plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract, the material parts of which follow:
“I hereby give you the exclusive sale of the said described property during a period of 90 days from date hereof, and thereafter until withdrawn by — 10 days — days’ written notice, and upon receipt of the purchase price I agree to make a good and sufficient conveyance of said property, by warranty deed, to the person or persons to be designated by you. The price of said property to be twenty five hundred and twenty five ($2525) net dollars. The terms of payment as follows, towit: Cash .upon delivery of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Summy v. RamseyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Chamberlain v. AbramsWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Cummings v. DolanWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Milton v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Seattle Land Co. v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hebb v. SeversonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Lake Company v. MolanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Brown v. KauscheWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Wilson v. KorteWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Moore v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.