Moore v. Elliott
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Everett Smith, J., entered Miarch 5, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for specific performance.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
Action to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property. The material facts are not disputed. On April 11, 1912, the plaintiff Moore, on behalf of the marital community consisting .of himself and wife, entered into a written contract with the defendants 'for the purchase of certain real estate belonging to the defend*521ants, and paid $100 on the purchase price. In payment of the remaining consideration, the plaintiffs were to convey to the defendants certain lots in the city of Seattle, and furnish an abstract showing good title. The abstract furnished showed that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bower v. BowerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Summy v. RamseyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Cummings v. DolanWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Hill v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Milton v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hebb v. SeversonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Garner v. Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Brown v. HermanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Flood v. Von MarcardWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Robinson v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.