Legal Opinion
Holst v. Oxman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 27, 2008No. 06-2346UnpublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
Hazel I. Holst filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Harry J. Oxman and his law firm, Oxman, Levi-tan, Goodstadt & Krevitz, P.C. (collectively, “Oxman”). The District Court dismissed her complaint with prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and denied her two subsequent motions for leave to amend her complaint. Holst appeals, arguing that if she were granted leave to amend, the complaint could withstand a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. We will affirm.
I
Holst is a retired plastic surgeon. In 2000,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Stanford Shane Otis Terrell Robert Stewart v. William Fauver, Commissioner James Barbo, Administrator Rogers, Chief Director of CustodyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Sheldon Krantz v. Prudential Investments Fund Management LLC Prudential Investment Management Services LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Skretvedt v. E.I. DuPont De NemoursCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Centifanti v. NixCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
3Cited by32 opinions
- Synthes, Inc. v. MarottaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Knopick v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- 4431, INC. v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANIESDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- ATTIAS v. 532 BROOKLYN, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- CRUNCH LOGISTICS INC. v. DONEGAL INSURANCE GROUPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.