Legal Opinion

Audrey Price v. Samuel Pierce

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 4, 1987No. 86-1906PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

In 1974 Congress passed a statute “For the purpose of aiding lower-income families in obtaining a decent place to live and of promoting economically mixed housing.” 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(a). (A “lower-income family” is one whose income is no more than 80 percent of the median family income in the area. 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(f)(l) (1976), now § 1437a(b)(2).) The statute authorized the Department of Housing and Urban Development to subsidize both existing housing (§ 1437f(b)(l)) and newly constructed or substantially rehabilitated housing (§ 1437f(b)(2), repealed in 1983). The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, a Pension Trust v. Gerber Truck Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Evergreen Square v. Wisconsin Housing & Economic Development AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Walter W. Donald v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. David A. Morlan v. Universal Guaranty Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API