Legal Opinion
Transmission Access Policy Study Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 30, 2000No. Nos. 97-1715, 98-1111 to 98-1115, 98-1118 to 98-1120, 98-1122, 98-1124 to 98-1129, 98-1131, 98-1132, 98-1134, 98-1136, 98-1137, 98-1139 to 98-1143, 98-1145, 98-1147 to 98-1150, 98-1152 to 98-1156, 98-1159, 98-1162, 98-1163, 98-1166, 98-1168 to 98-1176, 98-1178 and 98-1180PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM1:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction. . 681
II.FERC’s AuthoRity to Require Open Acoess. M OO CO
A. Statutory Challenges: FPA §§ 205 and 206 . lO OO CO
1. §§ 205 and 206 and Otter Tail Power Company. lO OO CO
2. § 206(a) Procedural and Evidentiary Requirements. cOO CO
3. Discriminatory Effect of Order 888 . CO OO CO
B. Constitutional Challenge: Fifth Amendment Takings Clause O Q CO
III. Federal versus State Jurisdiction over Transmission Services O O* ZO
A. Bundled Retail Sales. Oj Ci ZD
B. Local Distribution Facilities. LO OS CO
IV. RECIPROCITY. C5 CO
A. Indirect…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. BieDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2002
- North Star Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Opinion No. (2004), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2004