Legal Opinion

Keene Corp. v. Gardner

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 31, 1992No. 05-91-00817-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MALONEY, Justice.

This is an asbestos case. Keene Corporation appeals from a judgment for James Gardner, Bobby Sykes, Daniel Walding, and Robert Derryberry 1 (appellees). Ap-pellees sued Keene for strict products liability. In eight points of error, Keene contends: there is no evidence to show Derry-berry was exposed to MonoBlock 2 ; the jury’s answers did not establish an essential liability element; and the trial court abused its discretion by coercing a verdict. It also contends that the trial court erred in: not granting judgment non obstante veredicto because the jury’s answers did…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. McLennan v. American Eurocopter Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. Willis v. Donnelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  3. Spiller v. Spiller, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  4. Service Lloyds Insurance Co. v. Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  5. Murphy v. Seabarge, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API