White v. McPeck
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract on a promissory note for $176. Writ in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston dated September 9,. 1902. On appeal to the Superior Court the case was tried before Aiken, J., without a jury. The judge refused the defendant Braman’s requests for rulings which are stated in the opinion, and found for the plaintiff in the sum of $182.62. The defendant Braman alleged exceptions.
1Opinion of the CourtBoring, J.
This is an action on a promissory note dated July 15, 1902, signed McPeck and Company. The defendants McPeck and Braman at that time were partners. The plaintiff put in evidence showing that he was and is the agent of the Travelers Insurance Company; that McPeck and Braman became partners on February 8,1902 ; that before this partnership was formed McPeck had been doing business with one Alexander as a partner; that on February 8 McPeck held a policy on • the life of Alexander in the Travelers Insurance Company represented by the plaintiff, payable to him, McPeck, and Alexander held a policy…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Kavanaugh v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Kukuruza v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Bogosian v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Bruzas v. Peerless Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
- Union Central Life Insurance v. ZihlmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.