Legal Opinion

(PC) Hayde v. Zamora

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 26, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00432Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC RYAN HAYDE, No. 2:19-cv-0432 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 E. ZAMORA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and 18 has requested authority pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 19 2, 5). This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 20

636(b)(1)(B). 21 For the reasons stated below, the court shall grant plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma 22…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API