Legal Opinion

Baidan v. Shull

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 22, 2025No. 5:24-cv-03171Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 OREST BAIDAN, Case No. 24-cv-03171-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 10 v. MOTION TO DISMISS UNLAWFUL ARREST CLAIM IN AMENDED 11 JACOB SHULL, COMPLAINT 12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 25 13 14 Plaintiff Orest Baidan brings this action against defendant Jacob Shull, an officer of the 15 Mountain View Police Department, asserting violations of his civil rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 16 § 1983.1 Dkt. No. 1. In his original complaint, Mr. Baidan asserted two claims against Officer 17 Shull: (1) use…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API