Legal Opinion

People v. Giacamella

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1886No. 20222PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.

The defendant was accused of the crime of an attempt to commit arson, the information alleging that the “ defendant did in the night-time of said day willfully, maliciously, and feloniously attempt to burn, with intent then and there to destroy, a building,” the property of, etc. No demurrer was interposed. The defendant was convicted of an attempt to commit arson in the second degree; and moved in arrest of judgment, on the ground that the information did not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense, in that the information contained none of the definitions set forth in section…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. People v. WeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. HumphreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. People v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API