Legal Opinion

People v. Russell

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1889No. 20576PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of arson in the first degree. From the judgment -rendered against him in the premises and an order denying him a new trial, he has appealed.

He claims that his demurrer to the information should have been sustained, as that pleading did not charge him with any public offense. His argument in this connection is, that although the information is drawn substantially in the language of section 447 of the Penal Code, it was fatally defective because it did not go further, and declare in the language of section 448 of the same code that the building…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CroninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. People v. NicholCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. People v. GiacamellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. KellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  2. People v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. People v. BrittonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. People v. CovitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API