Legal Opinion
McGee v. . Frohman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 12, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following contract was introduced in evidence on the part of plaintiff, on the trial in the court below: "North Carolina — Gaston County. This agreement made and entered into by and between Emanuel Frohman, hereinafter designated as Frohman, and W. C. McGee, hereinafter designated as McGee, this 9 June, 1928:
"Witnesseth: That, whereas, the parties hereto have been engaged in the business of installing lubricating devices having a wick oiling means and acting by capillary attraction, said devices having been applied to the front bearings of spinning, twisting, and roving frames, the said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Francis v. W. J. & J. G. Edwards & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Wilson v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- McNeill v. . LawtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Cohoon v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Ætna Life Insurance v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coleman v. . WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Coleman v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945