Legal Opinion

McGee v. . Frohman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following contract was introduced in evidence on the part of plaintiff, on the trial in the court below: "North Carolina — Gaston County. This agreement made and entered into by and between Emanuel Frohman, hereinafter designated as Frohman, and W. C. McGee, hereinafter designated as McGee, this 9 June, 1928:

"Witnesseth: That, whereas, the parties hereto have been engaged in the business of installing lubricating devices having a wick oiling means and acting by capillary attraction, said devices having been applied to the front bearings of spinning, twisting, and roving frames, the said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Francis v. W. J. & J. G. Edwards & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. Wilson v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. McNeill v. . LawtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Cohoon v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Ætna Life Insurance v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coleman v. . WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Coleman v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API