Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 28, 1986No. Nos. 85-5532, 85-5702 and 85-5714PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*198OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

XET, Ltd. d/b/a CTA, Ltd., Computer Technology Associates, Inc., John R. Tor-quato, Jr., William T. Smith, Alan R. Stone-man, Judy Ellis, and David Herbert were charged in a thirty-nine count indictment with conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1982), fifteen violations of the Interstate Transportation and Aid of Racketeering (“I.T.A. R.” or “Travel Act”) statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3) (1982) and the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1982). The indictment outlined a conspiracy involving fifty-one overt acts, seven mail fraud…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. United States v. HoulihanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. EufrasioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Amos Salmon, No. 90-3355, Raymond E. Washington, No. 90-3363, Richard Fitzpatrick, No. 90-3366, John Surratt, No. 90-3438Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API