G.H. v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
MAJORITY OPINION
SCOTT BRISTER, Chief Justice.
Appellant G.H. was involuntarily committed for temporary inpatient mental health services and administration of psychoactive medication for a period not to exceed ninety days. Through her attorney ad litem, she challenges the legal and factual sufficiency to support this order. We affirm.
The medical records indicate G.H. has a history of bipolar disorder “with psychotic features.” She was brought to the emergency room of the University of Texas Medical Branch by a mental health deputy due to disruptive and disorganized behavior at home. When she…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mezick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
- Broussard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Johnstone v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
- In re J.S.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- State for the Best Interest & Protection of K.D.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- J.M. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- G.H. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- State ex rel. L.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- JM v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- State ex rel. H.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.