Legal Opinion

Cottrell v. Pawcatuck Company

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 21, 1956PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, Chief Justice:

The essential question is whether the consideration received upon a sale of corporate assets was grossly inadequate.

Plaintiff, a substantial stockholder of the defendant, The Pawca-tuck Company, formerly the C. B. Cottrell & Sons Company (herein referred to as “the old company”), sued to enjoin a sale of assets on the ground that the price was grossly inadequate.

An outline of the basic facts follows. It will be supplemented by additional facts in the discussion of plaintiff’s contentions.

The selling corporation is the old company, an old closely-held family…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  3. Rickards v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
  4. Stephenson v. Commonwealth & Southern Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1933
  5. Baron v. Pressed Metals of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Gimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
  3. Application of Delaware Racing AssociationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  4. Application of Delaware Racing Ass'nCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
  5. Hollinger Inc. v. Hollinger International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API