Legal Opinion

Wrightsman Petroleum Co. v. Schwartz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 1, 1932No. 20720PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.

Plaintiffs instituted suit toreeover upon an alleged oral contract for services rendered to defendant.

The case was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs. Parties will be referred to as they appear in the lower court. The record discloses that defendant owned two oil and gas leases located in Seminole county, Okla. One lease covered 40 acres and the other covered 120 acres. The land covered toy said leases was contiguous. The oil and gas leases on said property would expire within a short time and plaintiffs entered into- negotiations with defendant relative to drilling a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. FoltzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Boring-Kim Produce Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Howard v. ReelingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graham-Michaelis Drilling Co. v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. McBee v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API