Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Wohlfeil v. Sharel Ventures, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 2017No. 523523Published

1DissentAarons, J.

We respectfully dissent. Our review is limited to whether the Workers’ Compensation Board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence (see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181 [1978]). Under that time-honored standard, because the evidence credited by the Board supports its finding that claimant had a permanent partial disability and a 75% loss of wage-earning capacity, the Board’s determination should not be disturbed.

Clifford Ameduri, claimant’s treating physician, stated in his written report that claimant had reached maximum medical…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Claim of VanDermark v. Frontier InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Matter of Till v. Apex RehabilitationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Matter of Campbell v. Interstate Materials CorporationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. Matter of Roman v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API