United States v. Mario Escandar
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge:
In an unusual ease which finds both sides relying on legal propositions normally argued by the opposition, Defendant urges that his conviction for escape from federal custody should be overturned because his direct testimony at trial was too inculpatory, while the Government, in support of affirmance, awkwardly contends that his statements were not incriminating enough to establish a prima facie case. Believing that Defendant’s argument is but an idea whose time has not yet come — and probably never will — we affirm the judgment of the Trial Court.
Mario Eseandar had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Brainard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Jose Bueno, Leon Trevino and Victor Alegria, Cross-Appellants v. City of Donna, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- McKinnon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- John D. Brown v. Robert H. Butler, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. John Craige TerrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.