Legal Opinion

Helber v. Schaible

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1914No. Docket No. 34PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Replevin by James Helber against Theodore E. Schaible and another for an automobile. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

In October, 1911, plaintiff purchased a Ford automobile of defendants, and paid $560 therefor, with a warranty that it was a “good car and would run all right.” The car soon developed motor trouble, and plaintiff returned it several times to defendants at their garage in Ypsilanti, to have the defect corrected. After several attempts to adjust it, it still worked badly, and complaint was again made to defendants. Defendant Schaible then requested plaintiff to return the car to their garage and give him one more chance to adjust it, and promised if he could not do so he would give him a new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ferguson v. HemingwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. St. Cecelia Society v. Universal Car & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API