Legal Opinion

Cook v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 2, 1995No. CR 95-298PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Justice.

Appellant Jerry Dean Cook was convicted in municipal court of driving while intoxicated and violation of the implied consent law for refusing to take a breathalyzer test. He appealed to circuit court and in a jury trial before a chancellor sitting in exchange, was again convicted of both offenses.

On appeal he challenges the authority of the chancellor to sit in exchange for the circuit judge and asserts the trial judge erred in three respects, by failing to declare the lower court system to be an unconstitutional violation of his right to both speedy and jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reed v. GloverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Beck v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Hamilton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Thomson v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Golden v. Westark Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API