Legal Opinion
United States v. Reginald Hallman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 13, 1994No. 93-1801PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
I
Reginald Hallman (“Appellant”) appeals a sentence imposed on him by the district court. The district court had subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231. This court has jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).
II
On September 9, 1992, appellant used a stolen cheek to pay for a room at the Korman Suites in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. At the request of federal investigators, local authorities arrested the appellant and located stolen mail after he consented to a search of his vehicle.
Appellant pled guilty to a state forgery charge and was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Larry KoppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Stephen Martin BeddowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Joseph PalmaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Angel OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. SeligsohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Richard C. CrandonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States of America in No. 98-1146 v. David Rex Yeaman in No. 98-1102Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellant in No. 97-1433, v. Harry Lee RIDDICK, Jr., Harry Lee Riddick, Appellant in No. 97-1367Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.