Legal Opinion

Industrial Cotton Oil Co. v. Lial

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1914Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Counsel for appellee, in support of their contention that the burden was on the employer to show that the deceased was warned of the dangers of the employment, have cited Lawson v. Hamilton Compress Co., 162 S. W. 1023, Railway Co. v. Worden, 90 Ark. 407, 119 S. W. 830, and Labatt on Master and Servant, vol. 1, § 291. In these cases injuries to minors were under consideration; and it was the purpose of these authorities to say that, where minority is pleaded and relied on to avoid the assumption .of risk, the burden is on the employer to show that, notwithstanding his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arkansas Midland Railway Co. v. WordenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. St. Louis Stave & Lumber Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Lawson v. Hamilton Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API