Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Kernochan v. . Wendell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 20, 1921, which confirmed on certiorari a determination of the state comptroller assessing an additional income tax against the relator for the year 1919. The question involved was as to whether the payment of $50,892.21 for counsel fees and disbursements in a litigation commenced the year 1916, authorized to be paid by an order made December 28, 1918, and…

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 20, 1921, which confirmed on certiorari a determination of the state comptroller assessing an additional income tax against the relator for the year 1919. The question involved was as to whether the payment of $50,892.21 for counsel fees and disbursements in a litigation commenced the year 1916, authorized to be paid by an order made December 28, 1918, and actually paid on January 7, 1919, was an allowable deduction from gross income for the year 1919 in computing the net…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chahoon v. MealeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  2. Kernochan v. LawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API