Legal Opinion

Chahoon v. Mealey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.

This issue arises out of an item of $48,000, entered as a deduction in petitioner’s income tax return for the year 1936. It was a loss sustained by him on account of his participation in a so-called junior equity agreement entered into by him and certain-other individuals for the purpose of restoring the impaired capital and surplus of the Plattsburg National *51Bank and Trust Company so that the bank could continue to operate. The statute, Tax Law, section 360, allows as deductions in computing net income “ All the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Higgins v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Foss v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
  5. Van Wart v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kordig v. Grovedale Oleander Homes, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  2. Warnecke v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  3. Kordig v. Grovedale Oleander Homes, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API