Legal Opinion

Baltimore Transit Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 13, 1969No. [No. 55, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.

Shocked by the jury’s verdict, $35,000, Judge MacDaniel declared he would grant appellant’s motion for a new trial unless appellee (Smith) filed a remittitur of $20,000. Smith refused and appealed to this Court. We dismissed his appeal. After further argument in the court below Judge MacDaniel, somewhat recovered from his initial shock, reduced the remittitur to $15,000. Believing a new trial would “present a direct and unwarranted hazard to * * * [his] physical health and emotional stability” Smith remitted the $15,000. The remittitur, however, failed to assuage appellant’s state of shock…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. Langenfelder v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  3. Marshall v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  5. Hughes v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lahocki v. Contee Sand & Gravel Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Market Tavern, Inc. v. BowenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Braxton v. FaberCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Raines v. BoltesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API