Baltimore Transit Co. v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
Shocked by the jury’s verdict, $35,000, Judge MacDaniel declared he would grant appellant’s motion for a new trial unless appellee (Smith) filed a remittitur of $20,000. Smith refused and appealed to this Court. We dismissed his appeal. After further argument in the court below Judge MacDaniel, somewhat recovered from his initial shock, reduced the remittitur to $15,000. Believing a new trial would “present a direct and unwarranted hazard to * * * [his] physical health and emotional stability” Smith remitted the $15,000. The remittitur, however, failed to assuage appellant’s state of shock…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Langenfelder v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- Marshall v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Hughes v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lahocki v. Contee Sand & Gravel Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Market Tavern, Inc. v. BowenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Braxton v. FaberCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Raines v. BoltesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970