In re Criminal Investigation of John Doe, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
The government moves for an ex parte order pursuant to Rule 4.2, Comment 7 of the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct permitting it to contact three employees of a corporation which is represented by counsel. The corporation, certain employees, and other corporations are under criminal investigation for making false claims, paying bribes, and accepting kickbacks in connection with providing government services. Recently, according to the government, one employee contacted it indicating a willingness to speak with the government. The other two…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Richard Balter, No. 94-5593. United States of America v. Kenneth Cutler, No. 94-5625. United States of America v. Chris Oscar Dejesus, No. 94-5626Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Eid Hammad, A/K/A Eddie Hammad, and Taiseer HammadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Donald Eugene Ryans D/B/A Ryans Moving & Storage and Westside MoversCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Tyrone Powe, United States of America v. Robert JuarezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Regarding DoeDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MaloneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Wagner v. City of HolyokeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- In re Criminal Investigation of DoeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012