Legal Opinion
In re Criminal Investigation of Doe
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 14, 2012No. 12-mc-93024-MAPPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CONTACT A REPRESENTED PERSON (Document No. 2)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This memorandum and order concerns a motion brought by the United States (the “Government”) seeking authorization to contact a targeted individual without the consent of that individual’s counsel. The targeted individual is the subject of an ongoing federal grand jury investigation and the Government states that it intends to monitor communications between that individual and another individual who is cooperating with investigators. For…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Richard Balter, No. 94-5593. United States of America v. Kenneth Cutler, No. 94-5625. United States of America v. Chris Oscar Dejesus, No. 94-5626Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Eid Hammad, A/K/A Eddie Hammad, and Taiseer HammadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Wagner v. City of HolyokeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- In re Criminal Investigation of John Doe, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000