Legal Opinion

R.L. Hulett & Co. v. Barth

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1994No. 65315PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Defendants, Lyn and Millie Barth, appeal from a circuit court judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of plaintiff, R.L. Hulett & Company, etc. We affirm.

Plaintiff brought an action seeking compensation for services rendered to defen dants pursuant to a written contract between the parties. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, claiming, among other things, that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction because the contract contained a binding arbitration clause. Ultimately the dispute was submitted to arbitration and an award was entered in favor of plaintiff.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. School District of Independence, No. 30 v. U.S. Gypsum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Around the World Importing, Inc. v. Mercantile Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Masonic Temple Association of St. Louis v. FarrarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. May Department Stores Co. v. Adworks, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Holman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anthony v. KaplanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Major v. McCallisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Air Shield Remodelers, Inc. v. BiggsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Mead v. MOLONEY SECURITIES CO., INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Landers v. HuffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API