Legal Opinion

Maher Terminals, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided July 30, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRABTREE, J.T.C.

Plaintiffs seek review in these consolidated proceedings of defendant’s determination of deficiencies in sales and use tax. The audit period for Maher Terminals, Inc. (Maher) covers calendar quarters in the years 1976, 1977 and 1978. The audit period for Zim-American Israeli Shipping Co., Inc. (Zim) embraces calendar quarters in the years 1976 through 1980. The transactions giving rise to the sales tax deficiencies involve Maher as vendor and Zim as vendee in all instances. In some *518cases, both Maher and Zim have been assessed deficiencies with respect to the same transaction.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Whirlpool Corp. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peoples Express Co. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1989
  2. Hapag-Lloyd A.G. v. DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1984
  3. Maher Terminals, Inc. v. Director, Div. of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  4. Hapag-Lloyd v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API