Emmett Irr. Dist. v. Seymour
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the District of Idaho; Frank S. Dietrich, Judge. A cl ions at law by Edmund Seymour and others, as a committee representing bondholders, against the Emmett Irrigation District.
Read the full summary
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the District of Idaho; Frank S. Dietrich, Judge. A cl ions at law by Edmund Seymour and others, as a committee representing bondholders, against the Emmett Irrigation District. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. ' Actions at law to recover the interest represented by coupons on outstanding bonds of the plaintiff in error, the sum of which coupons amounts to $262,410 in case No. 3488, and $53,502 in case No. 3491, total $315,912.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
This is the third time this controversy has come before this court. It was first here in the case of Thompson *474v. Emmett Irrigation District, decided August 9, 1915, and reported in 227 Fed. 560, 142 C. C. A. 192.
The present actions are brought by the defendants in error, as a committee appointed by the owners of certain bonds and interest thereon, issued by the plaintiff in error as provided in section 2397 of the Revised Codes of Idaho, to recover from the said plaintiff in error the interest on said bonds maturing and due and payable on the 1st day of January, 1914,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thompson v. Emmett Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Wright v. East Riverside Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
- Emmett Irr. Dist. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918